Penelitian kualitatif dan kuantitatif sering diartikan secara salah sebagai masalah ada atau tidaknya statistik, ekonometrika, atau matematika sebagai alat. Penggunaan kata kualitatif dan kuantitatif mungkin turut berperan dalam kesalahkaprahan tersebut. Kenyataannya tidak sesederhana itu. Perbedaan penelitian kualitatif dan kuantitatif berawal Continue reading Kualitatif vs Kuantitatif
Category: Ngudo Roso
Structuralist Perspectives on Innovation
Unlike individualist perspectives (DOI, TRA, TPB, TAM, etc), a structuralist perspective argues that diffusion of innovation is determined by organisational characteristics (such as technology, strategy, differentiation, etc) and organisational variables (such as size, complexity, professionalism, formalisation, and governance) (Slappendel 1996). Structuralist perspectives are not only concerned with the organisation itself but also its environment. Within Continue reading Structuralist Perspectives on Innovation
SMEs and IT in Indonesia
SMEs contribute to the national economy by providing work and contributing significantly to Gross Domestic Products (GDP) and Gross National Product (GNP) (DeLone 1988; Diermen 1997; Foong 1999; Guinea, Kelley & Hunter 2005; Gutter & Saleem 2005; Hill 1995; Kuan & Chau 2001; SMIDEC 1998a; Tambunan 2005; Utomo & Dodgson 2001; Continue reading SMEs and IT in Indonesia
Qualitative and Quantitative Research
In recent years the debate on qualitative versus quantitative research has been well documented (e.g. Crotty 1998; Leedy & Ormrod 2005; Miles & Huberman 1994). Much of this debate does not take into account the underlying epistemology, ontology, and theoretical perspectives from each side (Crotty 1998; Miles & Huberman 1994). As a Continue reading Qualitative and Quantitative Research
Information Systems Failure in SMEs
While most studies in IS success are interested in defining or measuring the success itself, there are also studies in IS failure that usually looked for factors or causes of the failure. This posting will discuss concepts of IS failure and the two main approaches used to define IS failure. Continue reading Information Systems Failure in SMEs
Information Systems Success
The concept of IS success is problematic and can be interpreted in different ways (Caldeira & Ward 2002). For example, Brabander and Thiers (1984) defined IS success as related to the efficiency of the IS itself in meeting the requirements. IS success is also often associated with the benefits gained from the IS compared to the cost to acquire the IS (Ives, Olson & Baroudi 1983). However, cost–benefit analysis to measure IS success is difficult and previous Continue reading Information Systems Success
Actor Network Theory (ANT)
ANT is often accredited as the work of Michel Callon, Bruno Latour, and John Law (Callon 1986, 1999; Latour 1987, 1988, 1999; Law 1999; Sidle & Warzynski 2003; Sismondo 2004; Tatnall & Burgess 2004; Tatnall & Lepa 2003). ANT deals with (Bardini 1997): Continue reading Actor Network Theory (ANT)
Technology Acceptance Model (TAM)
TAM was formulated by Fred D. Davis to provide a valid measurement scale for assessing user acceptance of computers (Davis 1989, 1993). TAM is focused more on technology, and is claimed to be different from previous measurements as it provides a valid measurement scale to predict user acceptance of IT. These measurements were Continue reading Technology Acceptance Model (TAM)
Theory of Reasoned Action (TRA) and Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB)
TRA was formulated in 1967 in an attempt to provide consistency in studies of the relationship between behaviour and attitudes (Fishbein & Ajzen 1975; Werner 2004). TPB (Ajzen 1991) is considered as an extension of TRA (Werner 2004). The main assumption of TRA and TPB is that individuals are rational in considering their actions and the Continue reading Theory of Reasoned Action (TRA) and Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB)
Innovation Diffusion and Innovation Decision Process Model
Innovation diffusion uses an approach in which the decision to adopt new technology is mainly based on perceptions of the technology within the decision-making unit (Rogers 1995; Tatnall & Burgess 2004). IDPM was based on communication theory, where the innovation was communicated to the audience (potential adopters). IDPM could be Continue reading Innovation Diffusion and Innovation Decision Process Model